smilies : not differentiate min. from maj.
a bug or bad choice ?
Chans topics & messages displayed are altered with certains emoticons...
as the smiley oO in the word flood, etc.
It comes from not differentiate min. from maj.
Following the exemple of :o (surprised) and :O (scared). Signs are not allowed at the same picture ;).
(cf. attached file)
Can you change the rule, or fix the problem ? thank you :)
#2 Updated by Stéphane C over 7 years ago
I agree with you... too
observe these arguments
- with usual form :
xd, xD, XD, Xd
we must consider the case, and list all the possibilities
disadvantages: is not to forgot it & this multiplies the expressions
- with your system :
simplifies the writing for the same result as above
- no method to prevent the display of a smiley
Ex. KVirc Client displays a smiley on the words "pirate", "heart", "smileglasses"
so, LightIRC is set to do the same and i can't prevent this display : Pirate with P maj. for ex.
- I am the owner of channels games : quiz, motus, scrabble
the text must rigorously be displayed
Can you find this word : _ _ _ _ ?
-almost ! : _ O O _
perhaps boom, zoom, zoos, etc.
this is the already mentioned problem of "oO"
(my database has 785 words with 2 "o")
- a web link ?
Imagine : ("xd" = Emoticon)
what is the good choise for a modern applet ?
flexibility, increased personalization.
why not combine the two capabilities?
I suggest three ways :
- 1st method "global switch"
EmoticonsCasSensible = 0/1
0 for maj. = min. (default)
1 for maj. is not min.
- 2nd method "option set for each element"
:p\i -> prrr.png
option "\i" for "implicit" then :p = :P
or if you prefer the add formal option, as :
:p\f -> littleprr.png for only :p and not :P
- 3rd method (extra) regexp (re_ syntax) for "experts"
In my opinion the second approach seems better. With the addition of an optional "\f".
And three methods could be applied ?
try to be reasonable :)
#3 Updated by Roi Conde over 7 years ago
I don't really see the point or advantage by making difference between capitals or not.
The only atmosphere where 'HELLO' != 'hello' is in the coders world, but I think that for a chat, it would make no sense, and more than probably, people won't understand what's happening if for some reason, the smiley is not shown (if they mix Capitals and lowercase).
I think it would be a bad idea.
#4 Updated by Stéphane C over 7 years ago
I understand you... but not !
the advantage is not having a disadvantage.
Follow me :
"I'm certain that users prefer not to see a smiley expected, than the opposite situation"
That people know the difference between oo and oO
- For these applets, differentiation maj/min is. (as some clients : kvirc, mirc scripts, miranda...)
- If a smiley is displayed where it should not, sometimes i can act. But never with LightIRC. No choice, Impossible ! :)
It's up to us to make the proper adjustments, for the benefit of users.
- It would be accessory just want to differentiate : o and O
But make it possible, would have no more worries than usual :)
"the problem is particularly noticeable in the word games (and web links)"
my database contains really 785 words with "oo" (378323 total words)
have a look for "xd" emoticon : Auxdits, rixdale, etc. (french words) and for other languages ? I don't know.
I think: there are hundreds of IRC, thousands of salons and different perspectives.
Nothing was done without reason.
I prefer the flexibility, for something that is not superfluous
smiley.sad.emoticons=:-( :( :-< :<
yes, no a-z characters : but several signs for a single smileys ! Does that not the beginning of the solution ? (I wanted to start a new topic)
smiley.naughty.emoticons=:p :P :-p :-P slurp :P°
Smiley = "./ksk-tongue.png", 1, ":P ;P :-P ;-P :p", "Tongue"
it's not very elegant, but it is so
(new version of LightIRC)
:p :-p :p° -> prr.png (default = elegant = implicit)
oO Oo\f -> suspicious.png (option f = strict = formal)
"I understood the idea of LightIRC was good, but not complete..."
then the other applets are more flexible.
with little option \f : LightIRC will be over !
Then I do not think it is so hard to code :)
Merci Roi Conde, to participate in the discussion :)
#6 Updated by Kevin Glazenburg over 7 years ago
Valentin Manthei wrote:
Actually, I think this is a feature. It's easier to setup emoticons, if lower and upper case characters are handled the same.
However, if there are some other opinions, we can discuss it.
I think there should be some way to handle upper and lower case characters differently.
Stéphane C has given some nice ways of handling this. :)